Logo

LEGALITY AND EKONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF THE REFORM OF SPECIAL TAX REGIME FOR SMALL BUSINESSES IN THE CONSTRUCTION SECTOR

ბართია.png
Tsira Barthia

Executive Manager, Standards, Innovation and Professional Development Committee, Federation of Auditors, Accountants and Financial Managers

Abstract

The amendment introduced by Decree No. 436 of the Government of Georgia on 23 December 2024 substantially altered the scope of the special tax regime applicable to small businesses in the construction sector. Under the new regulation, self-employed individuals holding small business status who provide construction and repair services to entrepreneurial entities were, in practice, excluded from the benefits of the special tax regime.

This reform has triggered significant debate regarding its tax law legitimacy, economic efficiency, and social fairness, giving rise to sharply divergent viewpoints among policymakers, practitioners, and scholars.

The purpose of this study is to assess the legal, economic, and social implications of the regulation introduced by Decree No. 436, examine its consistency with the fundamental principles of tax law, and explore alternative regulatory approaches capable of achieving the declared policy objectives.

The research is based on the analysis of normative legal acts, comparative legal assessment, and economic reasoning. The findings indicate that the amendment has weakened the capacity of the special tax regime to fulfill its traditional social and economic functions, particularly in promoting employment, self-employment, and entrepreneurial activity. The study demonstrates that the objectives pursued by the state could have been achieved through less restrictive and more proportionate legal instruments.

The paper approaches the special tax regime for small businesses not merely as a fiscal mechanism but also as an integral component of social and employment policy. Such a perspective enables a comprehensive evaluation of the reform and its consequences across legal, economic, and social dimensions.

Keywords: small business; special tax regime; self-employment; tax legality; tax incentives.

References

  1. Constitution of Georgia. Tbilisi, 1995 (as amended). (In Georgian).
  2. Tax Code of Georgia. Tbilisi, 2010 (as amended). (In Georgian).
  3. Law of Georgia on Normative Acts. Tbilisi, 2009 (as amended). (In Georgian).
  4. Government of Georgia Resolution No. 415 of December 29, 2010, On Special Tax Regimes. (In Georgian).
  5. Government of Georgia Resolution No. 436 of December 23, 2024, On Amendments to Government of Georgia Resolution No. 415 of December 29, 2010, On Special Tax Regimes. (In Georgian).
  6. National Classification of Economic Activities (SEC 006-2016). National Classification of Georgia. (In Georgian).
  7. Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia. SME Development Strategy of Georgia 2021–2025. Tbilisi, 2021. (In Georgian).
  8. National Statistics Office of Georgia (Geostat). Employment and Self-Employment Statistical Indicators. Tbilisi, 2024. (In Georgian).
  9. National Statistics Office of Georgia (Geostat). Small and Medium Business Statistics. Tbilisi, 2024. (In Georgian).
  10. Kakulia, M. Tax Law. Tbilisi: Meridiani, 2021. (In Georgian).
  11. Abesadze, R. Economic Aspects of Small and Medium Enterprise Development. Economics and Business, No. 3, 2021. (In Georgian).
  12. Qoqiauri, L. Self-Employment and Small Entrepreneurship in Georgia: Contemporary Challenges. Social Economy, No. 2, 2022. (In Georgian).
  13. Papava, V. Economic Policy and the Challenges of Small Entrepreneurship Development. Tbilisi: Universali, 2019. (In Georgian).
  14. Abesadze, R. Economic Policy and Entrepreneurship Development in Georgia. The New Economist, 2024.
  15. OECD. Taxation and SMEs: Key Policy Issues. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015.
  16. OECD. Tax Policy Reforms 2024. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2024.
  17. OECD. Strengthening SMEs and Entrepreneurship for Productivity and Inclusive Growth. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023.
  18. International Labour Organization (ILO). Transition from the Informal to the Formal Economy Recommendation No. 204. Geneva: ILO, 2015.
  19. International Labour Organization (ILO). World Employment and Social Outlook 2024. Geneva: ILO, 2024.
  20. World Bank. Informality, Employment and Economic Development. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2023.

The New Economist, N2, 2026, Vol. 21, Issue 2.

გარეკანი-11.jpg
Published Date:

07/07/2026

Article Views: 7